haha yea i would probably do the same ;)
----- Original Message -----
From: "Kevin Graeme" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 1:39 PM
Subject: RE: bizarre - Mall Wants Charges Dropped


LOL!

While I'm glad that the mall is dropping charges, and viscerally I like what
the protesters did. If I were the mall owner, I'd have dropped the charges
on the two men and then had all the protestors arrested. But that's just me.

-Kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Nick McClure [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:10 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: bizarre - Mall Wants Charges Dropped
>
>
> http://abcnews.go.com/wire/US/ap20030305_2723.html
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Bill Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:54 PM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: bizarre
> >
> > Well it didnt say HOW the verble stuff started. Could have been some
> > people
> > saw the shirt took offense and started arguing. But at least its not
> just
> > a
> > plain THEY told me to take off my shirt waaa waaaaaa. But if the other
> > people started aruging with them it sucks that YOU have to take off
> your
> > shirt becuase someone started it first but thats just life.
> >
> >
> >
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Jim Davis" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 12:26 PM
> > Subject: RE: bizarre
> >
> >
> > > -----Original Message-----
> > > From: Josh Remus [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 11:10 AM
> > > To: CF-Community
> > > Subject: RE: bizarre
> > >
> > >
> > > The one thing I'll say is that the police report says they
> > > were "stopping" other customers (IE: potentially harassing
> > > them).  This may be the only reason the shirts got any notice.
> > >
> > > http://www.thesmokinggun.com/doc_o_day/crossgates1.html
> >
> > Of course the report is then contradictory: if they were stopping
> people
> > then they shouldn't have been asked to remove the shirts but rather to
> > stop stopping people.
> >
> > If the shirts were stopping with no specific actions on the wearers
> part
> > people then we're back to square one.
> >
> > Jim Davis
> >
> >
> >
> >
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Structure your ColdFusion code with Fusebox. Get the official book at 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/bkinfo.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to