that's what i thought...

[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:

> Nope,
> Never wet to a vote.  They would have, but they didn't get a chance to do
> so.
> 
> Tim
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 9:18 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> 
> 
> maybe I missed something but didnt the UN voted AGAINST this?
> 
> Ben Braver writes:
> 
> > Continuing the metaphor, how 'bout when the police have a warrant to
> arrest
> > someone for a felony, and some of the officers say they need time to
> gather
> > more evidence?
> > 
> > At 02:33 PM 3/21/03 +0000, you wrote:
> > >The UNSC is the police in that metaphor, and in a way that's exactly
> > >what they are supposed to be.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > >Sent: 21 March 2003 14:26
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> > >
> > >
> > >Since when are we the police?
> > >
> > >Not that I'm taking Saddam's side, that's just a bad metaphor.
> > >
> > >M
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > >Sent: Friday, March 21, 2003 5:01 AM
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> > >
> > >
> > >I can't believe what I'm reading, do you seriously mean that or are you
> > >winding me up?????
> > >
> > >If you're holding a gun and waving it about, and some big police man
> > >tells you to put it down while pointing his bigger gun at you, do you
> > >keep hold of your gun so you can fight back? Or do you do as you're told
> > >and put it down? Anyone with any sense puts his gun down right?
> > >
> > >Scuds are banned under several UNSC resolutions, he said he'd destroyed
> > >them and didn't have any left etc etc, clearly that's utter bs as he's
> > >fired around 10 into Kuwait in the last few days. If he's lied about
> > >Scuds, what else is he lying about? Probably an awful lot, and you see
> > >that as 'Hardly likely to be a big problem', wtf??? Are you on crack
> > >this morning Will?
> > >
> > >Don't get me wrong, war is horrific and I'm seriously concerned about
> > >the timing of the action, perhaps in a few months after the weapons
> > >inspectors realised for sure that Saddam was lying, the whole
> > >international community would have been behind it, but there is no doubt
> > >in my mind that sooner or later this was necessary.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> > >Sent: 21 March 2003 09:42
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> > >
> > >
> > >Not really. I find it incredible that anyone seriously thought he would
> > >disarm. Would you, with an aggresive force sitting on your doorstep?
> > >That's like saying, how far do you want me to bend over.
> > >
> > >So he has a few scuds? Hardly likely to be a big problem, and lets be
> > >honest, if we weren't invading him we'd never know about them.....
> > >
> > >will
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: 21 March 2003 09:34
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> > >
> > >
> > >Hmm, that wasn't the point was it?
> > >
> > >Point is, he's using weapons only hours bfore he swore he didn't have,
> > >extra proof of what kind of man he is, or was (hopefully), and of why he
> > >needs to be dealt with.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Will Swain [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: 21 March 2003 09:32
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> > >
> > >
> > >Nope....you don't kick a dog and then complain when it bites you.
> > >
> > >will
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Craig Dudley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: 21 March 2003 09:09
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: RE: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> > >
> > >
> > >Has your opinion now changed at all since Saddam has used 'banned' scud
> > >missiles that he promised he didn't have?
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Stephen Collins [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >Sent: 21 March 2003 02:27
> > >To: CF-Community
> > >Subject: Re: Prime Minister's Address to the Nation...
> > >
> > >
> > >Candace, et al.
> > >
> > >Our Prime Minister is a horrible, xenophobic man whose driving policy
> > >dictate is to be as sycophantic as possible to his masters in the White
> > >House. Popular support for a war on Iraq without explicit, non-vetoed UN
> > >approval is virtually non-existent here, and through his actions, PM
> > >Howard has made Australia an aggressor rogue state, and therefore no
> > >better than the despotic regime in Iraq itself. Today, I am ashamed to
> > >be an Australian. I am ashamed for Australia, the US and the UK.  I can
> > >only hope that the full force of UN sanctions and International Criminal
> > >Court charges are brought heavily upon those in power here and in other
> > >countries who are a part of the so-called "coalition of the willing".
> > >
> > >Not this war
> > >Not in my name
> > >Not without UNSC approval
> > >
> > >Steve Collins (www.stephencollins.org)
> > >--
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > 
> 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5
Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to