I don;t thin ka "fact" consisting of a statement that "Saddam has orange shoes" amounts to fabricated evidence.
If, on the other hand, someone shows a picture of Saddam with orange glitter glued to the photo, then I think "fabricated evidence" applies. Are you saying that the Bush administration created false evidence and then passed it off as true? Jerry Johnson >>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 05/28/03 10:45AM >>> According to the CIA? The 'fact' that he had active weapons of mass destruction and that he therefore posed a credible threat to the United States and the rest of the free world. The 'fact' that the US knew exactly where these WMD were. Also, the 'fact' that he had direct links to Al Qaida. These were all disputed at the time that the US presented them to the world, and they were never proven to anyone's satisfaction, apparently not even to the satisfaction of the United States own intelligence service. There were articles posted to this list about these issues before. -Gel -----Original Message----- From: Jerry Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Gel, I must have missed it, but what evidence exactly was fabricated? Jerry Johnson ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
