Hello Howie, I've not heard any glaring bad things from our users, but gosh Microsoft just got 2000 working right, I'd wait just a bit. Most of the applications for 2003 specific are mostly still vaporware/alphaware including the competitor to Macromedia's communications server products. We just got rid of our last NT 4.0 server, as it was stable and doing it's job at the time. Microsoft wants you to do this, but I'd wait for a reason. What is the specific benefit your looking to achieve form your upgrade?
Kind Regards, Mike Randolph At 08:57 PM 5/29/2003 -0400, you wrote: >Well, it's time to replace our aging Windows 2000 servers and my >suggestion was to look at Windows 2003 running IIS6. Does anyone have any >experience running this in production yet? > >Thanks, > >Howie > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
