I never said he didn't :) but he didn't do it to win an election.

Hrm you don't remember his 4 and a half minute apology speech then i guess.


"When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good
with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!"
Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Andy Ousterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 2:10 PM
Subject: RE: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment.


> When I read what you wrote, I see filtering going on of reality.
> 1.  I don't remember Clinton every admitting to lying -- could be
filtering
> on my part -- but I don't every recall hearing the words " I am sorry that
I
> lied to you"
> 2.  He did use military action to alleviate domestic concerns
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: William Wheatley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 12:42 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment.
>
>
> I'm all for character flaws and mistakes, lieing is lieing he fessed up in
> the end and thats what its all about. Of course it won't be till 20 years
> down the road when shrub apologizes for trying to take away american civil
> liberties causing another war to win an election all the other things he's
> done that are wrong. And just how clinton lied bush is apparently lieing
if
> you read any of those reports. I still believe if he lied about why we
went
> into iraq we vote him out and it doesn't change that we should have been
in
> there just because of human rights abuses alone and the previous WMD he
had.
>
> Bush is as much a liar as clinton. People always say how clinton let our
> military goto shit but what about the other view that he didn't want to
> throw ground troops into places that would endanger american lives for a
> reason that he didn't feel was good enough?
>
> *shrugs* People can debate BUSH v Clinton all day and come out stalemated.
> Shrub isn't the rose that some people paint him to be.
>
>
> "When I came back from Korea, I had no money, no skills. Sure, I was good
> with a bayonet, but you can't put that on a resume - it puts people off!"
> Frank Barone, "Everybody Loves Raymond"
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Andy Ousterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 1:18 PM
> Subject: RE: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment.
>
>
> > That's right.  He didn't do anything wrong.  He was totally innocent.
He
> > did not lie to all of us, he did not lie to the courts, he had nothing
to
> do
> > with Whitewater.  His wife is an investment genius.  He had/has a strong
> > character that gave him strength to say exactly what he believed in, be
> > damned with the polls......
> >
> > He is the classic example of why term limits are in place.  I might
> suggest
> > for those that would argue that were it not for term limits, Clinton
would
> > never have been elected.  As I remember it, he didn't exactly win the
> > majority of the votes.  Just enough to beat Bush, who had effectively
> > stopped running.
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:56 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: RE: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment.
> >
> >
> > What does impeachment have to do with anything?  Clinton wasn't
> > convicted of anything.  Impeachment means only that charges were brought
> > up.
> >
> > Matthew Small
> > IT Director
> > Showstopper American Dance Championships
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > 843-357-1847
> >
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:46 AM
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: Re: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment.
> >
> > As long as they haven't been impeached. ;)
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:59 AM
> > Subject: Re: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment.
> >
> >
> > > I think it's a good idea.  There would be a forced change after 2
> > terms
> > but then we would have the option of reelecting someone that had
> > previous
> > experience (which wouldn't be a bad thing).
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > >
> > > Howie
> > >
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > From: "Matthew Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:55 AM
> > > Subject: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment.
> > >
> > >
> > > > I'm sure everybody's already heard about this but I want to see what
> > > > your opinions are.  I want the chance to vote for Bill again - and
> > > > again, and again, and again...
> > > >
> > > > http://www.termlimits.org/Press/Press_Releases/20030529.html
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Matthew Small
> > > > IT Director
> > > > Showstopper American Dance Championships
> > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > > 843-357-1847
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> >
>
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Get the mailserver that powers this list at 
http://www.coolfusion.com

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to