<g> William Bowen writes:
> hey, hey, hey now... certainly not wanting to get myself labelled a "Clinton > apologist" here but didn't everybody make ~$100,000 the first time they > invested in cattle futures? > > ?_? > > ^_^ > > will > > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Andy Ousterhout" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:18 AM > Subject: RE: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment. > > > > That's right. He didn't do anything wrong. He was totally innocent. He > > did not lie to all of us, he did not lie to the courts, he had nothing to > do > > with Whitewater. His wife is an investment genius. He had/has a strong > > character that gave him strength to say exactly what he believed in, be > > damned with the polls...... > > > > He is the classic example of why term limits are in place. I might > suggest > > for those that would argue that were it not for term limits, Clinton would > > never have been elected. As I remember it, he didn't exactly win the > > majority of the votes. Just enough to beat Bush, who had effectively > > stopped running. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 10:56 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: RE: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment. > > > > > > What does impeachment have to do with anything? Clinton wasn't > > convicted of anything. Impeachment means only that charges were brought > > up. > > > > Matthew Small > > IT Director > > Showstopper American Dance Championships > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > 843-357-1847 > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Kevin Schmidt [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 11:46 AM > > To: CF-Community > > Subject: Re: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment. > > > > As long as they haven't been impeached. ;) > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Howie Hamlin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 8:59 AM > > Subject: Re: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment. > > > > > > > I think it's a good idea. There would be a forced change after 2 > > terms > > but then we would have the option of reelecting someone that had > > previous > > experience (which wouldn't be a bad thing). > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Howie > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > > From: "Matthew Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:55 AM > > > Subject: Clinton wants to change the 22nd amendment. > > > > > > > > > > I'm sure everybody's already heard about this but I want to see what > > > > your opinions are. I want the chance to vote for Bill again - and > > > > again, and again, and again... > > > > > > > > http://www.termlimits.org/Press/Press_Releases/20030529.html > > > > > > > > > > > > Matthew Small > > > > IT Director > > > > Showstopper American Dance Championships > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > 843-357-1847 > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
