I am saying that when your staff break into the offices of your political opponents, and thir *psychiatrists'* offices as well, then this tends to inhibit freedom of speech, to put it mildly, and is not exactly upholding the constitution.
Dana On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 12:13:44 -0400, Jerry Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > But isn't that just him using _his_ freedom of speech? > > Are you saying that he doesn't hav ethe right to say what he wants? > > Jerry Johnson > >>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 06/13/03 11:49AM >>> > freedom of speech. He used his office to browbeat political opponents. > > dana > > On Fri, 13 Jun 2003 08:03:05 -0400, Nick McClure <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > nacho.com> wrote: > >> What part of the constitution did he fail to uphold? >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Dana Tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Friday, June 13, >>> 2003 12:30 AM >>> To: CF-Community >>> Subject: Re: A good american >>> >>> So its ok to fail to uphold the constitution while seeking re-election? >>> If >>> Bush, let's say, in the midst of the next election, arrests critics >>> under >>> the Patriot Act... this is not a betrayal of the ideals on which the US >>> was >>> built? >>> >>> Dana >>> >>> >> >> >> > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more resources for the community. http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
