Seems to me the reviewers conclusions were right on the mark. ;-) -- jon mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Friday, June 20, 2003, 3:42:31 PM, you wrote: <snip> DT> The conclusion of the review was that she would be nuts to run for DT> president, but that the author had previously thought she would be nuts to DT> stick with Bill, and nuts to run for the Senate... might have been Meg DT> Greenfield? DT> Dana DT> Dana Tierney DT> On Fri, 20 Jun 2003 13:45:08 -0500, Kevin Graeme DT> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've heard that it tends to gloss over some issues. And that's from the >> "liberal" NPR. You can listen to the commentary here. >> http://discover.npr.org/features/feature.jhtml?wfId=1292815 >> >> Personally, I'm as uninterested in the book as is possible. As the >> commentary mentions, she's just starting her career not doing a big, >> tell-all finale. She can't burn bridges that she hasn't crossed. >> >> -Kevin >> ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
