... yeah, because they already got their rocks off on the female genitalia!!
-Ben > They didn't have the stones for it... > > > Rick > > -----Original Message----- > From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 11:19 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Stonehenge - genitalia? > > how come they didn't do stone boobs as well? > > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2003 12:11 PM > To: CF-Community > Subject: Re: Stonehenge - genitalia? > > > Good point - > the article didn't go into depth, though, > just gave the theory lip service. > ;-) > > -Ben > > > We're not a gun culture because we have something else on our minds :) > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > Date: Wednesday, July 9, 2003 9:59 am > > Subject: Stonehenge - genitalia? > > > > > ok, now this is a "screwy" theory :-) > > > > > > http://makeashorterlink.com/?Z20415535 > > > > > > http://story.news.yahoo.com/news? > > > tmpl=story&cid=573&ncid=757&e=3&u=/nm/20030709/od_nm/stonehenge_dc > > > > > > > > ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
