Glad to see this is getting some coverage in the US, the brown stuff has
been hitting the fan here for a couple of weeks. The Conservatives have
a even got a new catch phrase for use when Blair says anything - "Nobody
believes a word he says anymore".

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Howie Hamlin [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: 10 July 2003 18:47
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: A Diplomat's Undiplomatic Truth: They Lied
> 
> 
> Reprinted from LA Times
> 
> July 8, 2003
> 
> Robert Scheer:
> 
> A Diplomat's Undiplomatic Truth: They Lied
> 
> They may have finally found the smoking gun that nails the 
> culprit responsible for the Iraq war. Unfortunately, the 
> incriminating evidence wasn't left in one of Saddam Hussein's 
> palaces but rather in Vice President Dick Cheney's office.
> 
> Former Ambassador Joseph C. Wilson publicly revealed over the 
> weekend that he was the mysterious envoy whom the CIA, under 
> pressure from Cheney, sent to Niger to investigate a document 
> - now known to be a crude forgery - that allegedly showed 
> Iraq was trying to acquire enriched uranium that might be 
> used to build a nuclear bomb. Wilson found no basis for the 
> story, and nobody else has either.
> 
> What is startling in Wilson's account, however, is that the 
> CIA, the State Department, the National Security Council and 
> the vice president's office were all informed that the 
> Niger-Iraq connection was phony. No one in the chain of 
> command disputed that this "evidence" of Iraq's revised 
> nuclear weapons program was a hoax.
> 
> Yet, nearly a year after Wilson reported back the facts to 
> Cheney and the U.S. security apparatus, Bush, in his 2003 
> State of the Union speech, invoked the fraudulent Iraq-Africa 
> uranium connection as a major justification for rushing the 
> nation to war: "The British government has learned that 
> Saddam Hussein recently sought significant quantities of 
> uranium in Africa." What the president did not say was that 
> the British were relying on their intelligence white paper, 
> which was based on the same false information that Wilson and 
> the U.S. ambassador to Niger had already debunked. "That 
> information was erroneous, and they knew about it well ahead 
> of both the publication of the British white paper and the 
> president's State of the Union address," Wilson said Sunday 
> on "Meet the Press." 
> 
> Although a British Parliament report released Monday 
> exonerated the Blair government of deliberate distortion to 
> justify invading Iraq, it urged the foreign secretary to come 
> clean as to when British officials were first told that the 
> Iraq-Niger allegation was based on forged documents. The 
> report noted: "It is very odd indeed" that the British 
> government has still not come up with any other evidence to 
> support its contention about an Iraq-Niger connection.
> 
> Nor has the U.S. administration told its public why it 
> ignored the disclaimers from its own intelligence sources. In 
> order to believe that our president was not lying to us, we 
> must believe that this information did not find its way 
> through Cheney's office to the Oval Office. 
> In media interviews, Wilson said it was the vice president's 
> questioning that pushed the CIA to try to find a credible 
> Iraqi nuclear threat after that agency had determined there 
> wasn't one. "I have little choice but to conclude that some 
> of the intelligence related to Iraq's nuclear weapons program 
> was twisted to exaggerate the Iraqi threat," Wilson wrote in 
> an Op-Ed article in Sunday's New York Times. "A legitimate 
> argument can be made that we went to war under false pretenses." 
> 
> In a Washington Post interview, Wilson added, "It really 
> comes down to the administration misrepresenting the facts on 
> an issue that was a fundamental justification for going to 
> war. It begs the question, what else are they lying about?" 
> Those are the carefully chosen words of a 23-year career 
> diplomat who, as the top U.S. official in Baghdad in 1990, 
> was praised by then-President George H.W. Bush for his role 
> as the last American to confront Hussein face to face after 
> the dictator invaded Kuwait. In a cable to Baghdad, the 
> president told Wilson: "What you are doing day in and day out 
> under the most trying conditions is truly inspiring. Keep 
> fighting the good fight." 
> 
> As Wilson observed wryly, "I guess he didn't realize that one 
> of these days I would carry that fight against his son's 
> administration." And that fight remains the good fight. This 
> is not some minor dispute over a footnote to history but 
> rather raises the possibility of one of the most egregious 
> misrepresentations by a U.S. administration. What could be 
> more cynical and impeachable than fabricating a threat of 
> rogue nations or terrorists acquiring nuclear weapons and 
> using that to sell a war? 
> 
> "There is no greater threat that we face as a nation," Wilson 
> told NBC, "than the threat of weapons of mass destruction in 
> the hands of nonstate actors or international terrorists. And 
> if we've prosecuted a war for reasons other than that, using 
> weapons of mass destruction as cover for that, then I think 
> we've done a great disservice to the 
> weapons-of-mass-destruction threat."
> 
> The world is outraged at this pattern of lies used to justify 
> the Iraq invasion, but the U.S. public still seems numb to 
> the dangers of government by deceit.
> 
> Indeed, Nixon speechwriter William Safire this week in his 
> column channeled the voice of his former boss to reassure 
> Republicans that the public easily could be conned through 
> the next election.
> 
> Perhaps, and far be it for me to lecture either Safire or a 
> reincarnated Nixon as to the ease of deceiving the 
> electorate, but as we learned from the Nixon disgrace, lies 
> have a way of unraveling, and the truth will out, even if 
> it's after the next election. 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Your ad could be here. Monies from ads go to support these lists and provide more 
resources for the community. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/ads.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to