I always suspected that he had a very good reason for leaving.

-Kevin

> -----Original Message-----
> From: David Lakein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] 
> Sent: Wednesday, July 16, 2003 4:08 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Bush does it again :-)
> 
> 
> That used to be Ari Fleischer's job, actually...
> 
> - David
> 
> Angel Stewart wrote:
> 
> > "July 15, 2003  |  A "darn good" quote that almost nobody 
> quoted "We 
> > gave him a chance to allow the inspectors in, and he 
> wouldn't let them 
> > in." George W. Bush uttered that amazing sentence yesterday 
> to justify 
> > the war in Iraq, according to the Washington Post.
> >
> > What? Yes, I promise that's what the man said. (And by "him," the 
> > president clearly meant Saddam Hussein -- not Kim Jong Il, who 
> > actually has refused to let international inspectors into North 
> > Korea.)
> >
> > Now a presidential statement so frontally at variance with the 
> > universally acknowledged facts obviously presents a problem for the 
> > White House press corps. He wasn't joking, and he didn't sound 
> > disoriented or unwell. Although Dana Priest and Dana 
> Milbank wrote the 
> > story as delicately as they possibly could, they couldn't 
> make it seem 
> > less weird:
> >
> > "The president's assertion that the war began because Iraq did not 
> > admit inspectors appeared to contradict the events leading 
> up to war 
> > this
> > spring: Hussein had, in fact, admitted the inspectors and Bush had
> > opposed extending their work because he did not believe 
> them effective."
> >
> > Appeared to contradict the events leading up to war? 
> Indeed, that's an 
> > exceedingly mild description of what Bush said. There's no 
> plausible 
> > explanation, unless the president suddenly flashed back to his Yale 
> > sophomore philosophy seminar, grappling with the argument that 
> > everything we perceive is mere illusion.
> >
> > For the moment, however, let's just assume reality does exist. What 
> > possessed the president to make an assertion that everyone on the 
> > planet knows to be untrue? And who is going to take the 
> responsibility 
> > for this one? Did George Tenet vet Bush's statement? Do the British 
> > have a secret dossier proving that Saddam never actually 
> admitted Hans 
> > Blix and the UNMOVIC teams? Will Condi Rice or Donald 
> Rumsfeld show up 
> > on Fox News next weekend to explain why Bush's statement is 
> > "technically accurate," even though he shouldn't have said it?
> >
> > As hard to explain as what Bush said is the press corps' failure to 
> > report his stunning gaffe. The sentence quoted above 
> doesn't appear in 
> > today's New York Times report, for example. Yet there is no 
> question 
> > about what he said -- undoubtedly to the amazement of both 
> Kofi Annan, 
> > who was sitting beside him at the time, and the dozens of reporters 
> > who were present during their brief joint press conference.
> >
> > Anyone who doesn't believe me (or the Post) can watch Bush say the 
> > exact words quoted above here, toward the end of the White 
> House's own 
> > videotape of his remarks, under the headline "President Reaffirms 
> > Strong Position on Liberia."
> >
> > Another recent president once said something that was blatantly 
> > untrue, if fairly trivial, and the videotape of his statement was 
> > replayed again, and again, and again, and again ...
> >
> > -Joe Conason"
> >
> > -Gel
> >
> > 
> 
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~|
Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5
Subscription: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5

Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in 
ColdFusion and related topics. 
http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm

                                Unsubscribe: 
http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
                                

Reply via email to