> -----Original Message----- > From: Ian Skinner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 11:25 AM > To: CF-Community > Subject: RE: Loch Ness monster does not exist... > > The most compelling study I saw, was an earlier sonar survey study smaller > but similar to this one. That one also found no hint of any large > monster. > But even more telling, found no schools of fish or other aquatic life that > could support a large animal. Apparently this loch is rather an aquatic > desert.
I believe that study also found that the geology of the area would almost definitely indicate no underwater caves of any size. The best evidence I've seen so far is the confession of the photographer of the famous "head and neck" picture that he faked it. Another point is the story that a local had seen Nessy and then shot her (one of the more celebrated sightings). This was followed shortly by the smaller story that an Atlantic sturgeon (about 15' in length if I remember correctly) was found washed up on beach later on with a bullet wound. ;^) Jim Davis ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~| Archives: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?forumid=5 Subscription: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/index.cfm?method=subscribe&forumid=5 Signup for the Fusion Authority news alert and keep up with the latest news in ColdFusion and related topics. http://www.fusionauthority.com/signup.cfm Unsubscribe: http://www.houseoffusion.com/cf_lists/unsubscribe.cfm?user=89.70.5
