That might be out of the scope of a pure transform engine, though. For
that matter, has anyone seen any reports on transformation engines and
their relative response time under stress?
- Jim
Sandy Clark wrote:
>ESPN is a XHTML/CSS site.
>
>Of course XHTML is XML if you want to be nitpicky.
>
>I talked to someone at the MX North conference (email me for the name if you
>want). He told me that they were doing some sites in XML/XSLT because of
>accessibility issues. However the time to actually parse and render the site
>was fairly slow. What happens with that is that the XML/XSLT is reparsed
>into an HTML/XHTML document with tags and then rendered. So you still end up
>with the HTML for the site.
>
>The only way something like that would be viable would be if they wanted to
>use that information in some other form as well, such as printing in SGML
>and publishing to the web.
>
>Sandy
>
> _____
>
>From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 3:26 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re: XML
>
>
>I've heard ESPN is now an all XML/CSS site - I'll have to Google for
>some info, though.
>
>- Jim
>
>Haggerty, Mike wrote:
>
>
>
>>Correct. And that is how things should be done, were it not for those
>>meddling browsers like NS 4.
>>
>>I just wanted to know if anyone knew of any large sites where this was
>>done, the RFP is for a high volume public Web site.
>>
>>M
>>
>>-----Original Message-----
>>From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 2:59 PM
>>To: CF-Community
>>Subject: Re: XML
>>
>>
>>I don't think the browser mattered at that point. Your
>>application
>>would take XML and push it through an XSL, which could then
>>output
>>(X)HTML , which is all the browser would see. IE, however, can
>>take a
>>raw XML document and parse it with a stylesheet if it's
>>referenced in
>>the header, without using a server to build the XSL's output
>>first.
>>
>>- Jim
>>
>>Deanna Schneider wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>>>You could build an entire site in xml if you knew your browser
>>>
>>>
>>audience. IE
>>
>>
>>>supports XML and XSLT. I don't think you'd want to do that,
>>>
>>>
>>though.
>>
>>
>>>-d
>>>
>>>----- Original Message -----
>>>From: "Shawn Regan" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 1:23 PM
>>>Subject: RE: XML
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>As far as I know no one is build entire sites from XML/XSLT.
>>>>
>>>>
>>Some sections
>>
>>
>>>>or certain types of formatted and shared content would benefit
>>>>
>>>>
>>from it but
>
>
>>>>not an entire website.
>>>>
>>>>Shawn Regan
>>>>
>>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>>From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>>>Sent: Friday, October 17, 2003 10:43 AM
>>>>To: CF-Community
>>>>Subject: XML
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Last night, I received an RFP for a Web project. The
>>>>
>>>>
>>contractor is
>>
>>
>>>>required to have a track record in developing pure XML/XSLT
>>>>
>>>>
>>Web sites
>>
>>
>>>>using dynamic Web technology.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>Can anyone point to a site authored exclusively in XML or
>>>>
>>>>
>>XSLT? I am not
>>
>>
>>>>sure one exists.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>M
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _____
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>> _____
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
> _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
