I agree, but I had to shoot back to a degree, especially if you're going
to call me a spammer.  I only send out 50 million emails a day, and
everyone opted in!  Honest!

- Jim

brob wrote:

>Let's think about it.  I think i speak for most guys when I say that young girls are attractive.  I dont mean yonug young, but generally young, like 16-17-18-19, cos they tend to look the same throughout those years.  and I'm still pretty young myself.  Also add to the fact that girls are looking alot older than they are these days.  If a girl looks hot then I'm attracted to her.  The next step is to make sure she's legal.  lol
>
>
>By the way, whats worse.  You're 21, and you're........sleeping with a 14 yr old that looks 21....or a 21 yr old that looks 14.  I still cant figure it out myself.  Not that i'm in that situation ahaha
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Jim Campbell
>  To: CF-Community
>  Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:51 PM
>  Subject: Re: List of arcane jobs
>
>
>  Brob Ephebephile?  :)
>
>  Actually, I'm expecting to change my last name from Campbell to CtrlAltDel
>
>  - Jim
>
>  brob wrote:
>
>  >They don't have Blacksmith!
>  >
>  >I was wondering if we were to have those kinds of names for jobs we do today, what they will be.  Obviously people who work in the porn industry got i down, so i wont go there.
>  >
>  >Jim Monkey (cos you're a code monkey)
>  >Jim Cody (cos you code)
>  >Jim Coder (same deal)
>  >Jim Hacker
>  >Jim Spammer
>  >Jim Admin (that sounds cool!)
>  >Jim Slacker (slacker!)
>  >Jim Tech
>  >Jim Webby
>  >Jim De' bugger (hehehe)
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >Please contribute to the list
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  >  ----- Original Message -----
>  >  From: Jim Campbell
>  >  To: CF-Community
>  >  Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2003 2:24 PM
>  >  Subject: List of arcane jobs
>  >
>  >
>  >  This is something interesting:
>  >
>  >  http://www.cpcug.org/user/jlacombe/terms.html
>  >
>  >  A list of obsolete and arcane jobs from the past.  It's especially
>  >  interesting to see so many last names (or roots of last names) that
>  >  exist today from people who recieved surnames based on the jobs or
>  >  purposes of their ancestors - Chandler, Shoemaker, Freedman, Goldsmith, etc.
>  >
>  >  - Jim
>  >
>  >
>  >
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to