quickly, but sometimes it only appears that way, depending on your
circle of friends, etc....
I think I will implement MX in the development, unless anyone else
disagrees.
Robert Bailey
Simon Horwith wrote on 10/29/2003, 8:18 AM:
> in that case, I'd definitely buid for MX. As far as I know, MX 6.1 has
> gotten faster market penetration since it's release than any prior
version
> in the same amount of time. Quite honestly, I can't think of any good
> excuse not to upgrade, and I believe that most companies that want to
stay
> competitive feel the same way.
>
> ~Simon
>
> Simon Horwith
> CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
> Member of Team Macromedia
> Macromedia Certified Instructor
> Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
> Certified Flash MX Developer
> CFDJList - List Administrator
> http://www.how2cf.com/
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Robert Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 29 October 2003 13:16
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: How common is MX in production?
>
> Yes, I could see many benefits with the use of CFC's, MX security,
> login, etc... I was thinking of creating web services so that one may
> access the application without going through the web interface and
> allowing for other applications to use the data and functions. This is
> not a need but more of a desire. But I do not want to push out any
> potential customers that may not have upgrade to MX. Maybe I should
> steer clear of the MX functions?
>
> Robert Bailey
>
> Simon Horwith wrote on 10/29/2003, 8:09 AM:
>
> > would the implementation of your application solely for CF MX
> result in
> > significant benefits over a version compatible with a prior
version of
> > ColdFusion?
> >
> > ~Simon
> >
> > Simon Horwith
> > CTO, Etrilogy Ltd.
> > Member of Team Macromedia
> > Macromedia Certified Instructor
> > Certified Advanced ColdFusion MX Developer
> > Certified Flash MX Developer
> > CFDJList - List Administrator
> > http://www.how2cf.com/
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Robert Bailey [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: 29 October 2003 12:17
> > To: CF-Community
> > Subject: How common is MX in production?
> >
> > So I am thinking of creating a little app for distribution and I am
> > leaning to the use of CFMX for development, but how common is CFMX
> when
> > it comes to production? Would I be better off making sure it is
> > compatible with 4.5 and up? Any help would be greatly appreciated.
> >
> > Thanks!
> > Robert Bailey
> >
> >
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
