Thats right... sometimes hard to tell the difference between Krusty the
Clown and George Bush...

At 08:11 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
>Hahaha! Yeah, because the cartoon image of Krusty the Clown running for
>office is going to be confused with real news.
>
>Here's a transcript of the segment:
>
>----
>[Split screen: showing Krusty with the American flag behind him; for his
>Democratic opponent, the background was a Soviet flag. Devil horns were
>superimposed on his head.]
>
>Fox News Announcer: Welcome to Fox News, your voice for evil. Tonight, we'll
>be interviewing the top two candidates for Springfield's 24th Congressional
>district. For the Republicans, beloved children's entertainer, Krusty the
>Clown. And for the Democrats, this guy.
>
>Democrat: Hey, I have a name.
>
>Fox News Anchor: Yes, I'm sure you do, comrade. I do appreciate your being
>here. You're usually so mired in sleaze, it must be an effort to come down
>to the studio.
>
>Krusty: May I say something?
>
>Fox News Anchor: Certainly, Congressman.
>
>Democrat: He hasn't won yet!
>
>Fox News Anchor: You make a very adulterous point. We'll now conclude this
>debate with a Krusty campaign commercial.
>----
>
>-Kevin
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "Jacob" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Thursday, October 30, 2003 9:12 AM
>Subject: Re: Fox almost sues itself
>
> > "Now Fox has a new rule that we can't do those little fake news crawls on
> > the bottom of the screen in a cartoon because it might confuse the viewers
> > into thinking it's real news,"
> >
> > LOL
> >
> > At 06:39 AM 10/30/2003, you wrote:
> > >This one's a winner:
> > >
> >
> ><http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1517&e=1&u=/afp/lifestyle_
>us_television>http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&cid=1517&e=1&u=/af
>p/lifestyle_us_television
> > >
> > >Fox News almost sues its sister station, Fox Entertainment over a
> > >Simpsons episode that makes fun of Fox's, uh, fair and balanced news
> > >coverage.  Rupert Murdoch decided suing himself would be even more
> > >embarassing than suing Al Franken, I guess.
> > >
> > >- Jim
> > >
> > >----------
> > >[
> >
>
>----------
>[
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to