What you are describing is "equality"     I don't have a problem with it.

----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthew Small" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:42 AM
Subject: Re: You People

| What happens when a same-sex couple divorces?  Who gets the child?  Who pays
alimony?  WIll be be ok for any two people to get married just for the benefits?
A couple of guys are roommates, one needs health insurance, the other has it so
they get married.  In the military, a person gets extra money to live off base
when he/she gets married - will that apply to a couple of privates who don't
want to live in the barracks?  There are a lot of issues that this will
confound.
|
| - Matt Small
|   ----- Original Message -----
|   From: Haggerty, Mike
|   To: CF-Community
|   Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:24 AM
|   Subject: RE: You People
|
|
|   I'm not sure this is guilt some much as my stupid-people sense kicking
|   in. I mean, I'm not rapidly opposed to the idea, I can just see
|   situations where it might be put to bad use.
|
|   Soemthing strikes me as odd when two guys could watch the Red Sox play a
|   1:00 game, get wasted on Schlitz, and end up at a county courthouse
|   later that day with the full legal right to get married.  That's not
|   catholic guilt, that's a joke people were telling back in the 50s.
|
|   Or a fraternity could use it as a hazing ritual, getting all the plebes
|   married off to one another. I have seen this done in mock fashion, and I
|   know people who would have made kids go all the way (and kids who would
|   have).
|
|   Or a gang thing where you have to prove how hardcore you are.
|
|   Imagine if downtrodden men were marrying themselves off to help
|   immigrants get citizenship. Panhandlers will beat themselves up with
|   sticks for a $20, why not marriage?
|
|   It just strikes me as running counter to the stated aims of the
|   instituion of marriage, to bring social and financial stablity to a
|   country. People could easily abuse this for short-term gain, amusement,
|   status, etc. The bar would need to be set fairly high in order to avoid
|   the problems that go along with it.
|
|   M
|
|   -----Original Message-----
|   From: Heald, Tim [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|   Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:05 AM
|   To: CF-Community
|   Subject: RE: You People
|
|   >I blame the Liberals on this list for derailing my train of thought.
|   >Nobody ever talk about same sex marriage again, it gives me the
|   willies.
|
|   That's just your catholic guilt reflex kicking in man.  You'll get over
|   it
|   :)
|
|   Tim
|
|   -----Original Message-----
|   From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
|   Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:05 AM
|   To: CF-Community
|   Subject: You People
|
|   I had something important I was going to respond to, where someone asked
|   a question and didn't get a response. I had it all thought out and was
|   getting ready to put it to email, when someone asked me something about
|   stylesheets here in the office. I helped him out, then that thread about
|   Massachusetts came up and I had to post something dumb.
|
|   Now I can't remember what I was going to say, or who I was going to
|   respond to. I looked through all the messages (handily sorted by
|   Microsoft Outlook 2003, the best email editor there is or ever will be)
|   and realized I cannot find what I was going to respond to.
|
|   ...
|
|   I blame the Liberals on this list for derailing my train of thought.
|   Nobody ever talk about same sex marriage again, it gives me the willies.
|
|   M
|     _____
|
|
|
|
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to