Wife 1: Take the trash out you lazy bastard
Wife 2: Take the trash out you lazy bastard
Wife 3: Take the trash out you lazy bastard
Wife 4: Take the trash out you lazy bastard
Wife 5: Take the trash out you lazy bastard
Wife 1: Go pick up some milk
Wife 2: Go pick up some milk
Wife 3: Go pick up some milk
Wife 4: Go pick up some milk
Wife 5: Go pick up some milk
Wife 1: I have a headache
Wife 2: I have a headache
Wife 3: I have a headache
Wife 4: I have a headache
Wife 5: Ok lets go.....
Ok maybe there are benefits to having 5 wifes ;)
--
Bill Wheatley
Senior Database Developer
eDiets.com, Inc.
(OTCBB: EDET)
3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
F: (954) 360-9095
E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
-----Original Message-----
From: Michael Dinowitz [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:57 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: polygamy Re: CNN Breaking News
Torah wise it was allowed but had strict rules. (it was prohibited in
the
middle ages as it was used as another excuse to kill Jews) Christian
bible
wise, any sex is bad so lots of sex is worse (abstinence is closest to
God).
Islam wise, it's still allowed.
Personally, I don't think its worth the headache.
> LOL sweet these debates are awesome, good questions. People have been
> wanting to see polygamy legal for a long time, well certain people
> anyway.
>
> The nice thing about CF -community is the debates i loeveee the
debates
> .
>
>
> --
> Bill Wheatley
> Senior Database Developer
> eDiets.com, Inc.
> (OTCBB: EDET)
> 3801 W. Hillsboro Blvd.
> Deerfield Beach, FL 33442
> V: (954) 360-9022 ext. 159
> F: (954) 360-9095
> E: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> W: <http://www.ediets.com/> www.ediets.com
>
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Matthew Small [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 2:03 PM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News
>
>
> On this point, if two people want to have a committed, loving
> relationship, why can't three? Why not ten? Where does the number
two
> come from? Tradition? Society? You're insinuating that polygamy is
> wrong.
>
> It sounds like now we're pushing past your comfortable area. I happen
> to think marriage is between a man and a woman. You (I'm inferring
from
> the message) think it's between any two people. Somebody else might
> recognize it between six people. Where does it end?
>
> - Matt Small
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: BethF
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 1:18 PM
> Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News
>
> Where does the logic that same-sex marriage logically leads to
> polygamy?
>
> Homosexual people also have families. They have children, and
> partners, just like you do. How does it being recognized as a legal
> contract hurt traditional marriage?
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Matthew Small
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 7:35 AM
> Subject: Re: CNN Breaking News
>
> I don't think I agree with you - the basic precept of marriage is
to
> create a family structure, and swinging violates that precept since it
> introduces an outsider into the structure. The family structure is
> central to ours and most societies, which is why there is a push for
> same sex marriages by homosexual couples. Why get married if you want
> to include others? Only for the licensing, as Jim Campbell tells me.
I
> guess the next logical step for the court to take is to allow
marriages
> of three or more people - and it will happen.
>
> - Matt Small
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: Heald, Tim
> To: CF-Community
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 11:02 AM
> Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News
>
> Realistically adultery is a religious construct. You look at
the
> various
> polyamory movements and swingers and so forth and see groups
that
> don't
> believe in monogamy, and they are perfectly happy with their
> choice. Now
> obviously you need to look at it kind of like contract law too I
> guess. If
> you agree to monogamy during your vows you should be somehow
> bound, but
> altering the vows to allow extra marital relations should
> certainly be
> allowed. The military has some very out dated laws regarding
> sexuality
> still. Sodomy of any kind, even when consent is given, is
> prohibited.
> That's just silly in this day and age.
>
> Tim
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:58 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News
>
> I was just thinking the same thing...
>
> Obviously, adultery has no consistent meaning in a legal sense
and
> all
> definitions of it should be thrown out until something that
works
> can be
> discovered. This should apply to religious institutions as well.
>
> Should mean Erika is released from any monogomous obligations
she
> previously felt bound by, Gel.
>
> M
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jacob [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 18, 2003 10:51 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: CNN Breaking News
>
> So let me get this right...
>
> In Massachusetts, same-sex marriages are ok
>
> But in New Hampshire, if you are married and have an affair with
> someone
> of
> the same sex, it is not adultery.
>
> _____
>
>
> _____
>
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
