eliminate existing "text size" URL vars before adding more).
As to style sheet: the main reason is that some of this code is nearing 6
years old. ;^) I've been incrementally upgrading parts, but haven't gotten
around to that yet. Also, in some cases there are (or were) changes that
couldn't be easily done with a printer style sheet. For example one year we
had Flash component that let you generate a "resolution" - it spun and lit
up and all that fun. The "print" version however just presented a simple
graphical version of the same thing.
I've also had cases where I might use CFGRID to display a long list of
things in the "online" version and dump the list to HTML for the print
version.
That's not to say that I still couldn't make good use of the print style
sheet - but for some things it doesn't seem to work. Of course things have
probably improved a lot since I last tried.
I would like to convert the whole thing to a completely CSS design (right
now it's all tables) but it won't be this year. We'll mark that up as a
possibility for February. ;^)
Jim Davis
_____
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, December 04, 2003 5:11 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re:Anybody Feel like Reviewing a Site?
Jim Davis wrote:
> We've just completed the first major 2003 launch of our event site at
> http://www.firstnight.org and I was hoping for some opinions.
- got the same issue with font size
- why provide a print friendly version instead of a printer stylesheet
Usually my list with issues is much longer :-)
Jochem
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
