Stephen E. Schuster
PeopleSoft Administrator
2000 Ashland Drive
Ashland, KY 41101
Office Phone 606.920.7447
Cell Phone 606.831.4590
_____
From: cantrl. a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 2:56 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re:Kevin Schmidt in GQ
Well then I'll just use the same excuses when I need to go to Target/Wal
Mart to pick up my chinese merchandise. They're common, they carry a lot of
my chinese merchandise gear, and most importantly they're well armored from
the terrorists who Tom Ridge keeps warning us are about to attack.
He's not the president yet, why does he need the Secret Service?
I call wanker.
>The secret service will pretty much tote these guys around and tell them
>what they ride in.
>
>The Secret Service uses Suburbans for several reasons. They are common,
>they can carry a lot of people and gear for details, most importantly they
>can carry all the armor they need.
>
>--
>Timothy Heald
>Web Portfolio Manager
>Overseas Security Advisory Council
>U.S. Department of State
>571.345.2319
>
>The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
>Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
>opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
>unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: cantrl. a [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 3:25 PM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: Re:Kevin Schmidt in GQ
>
>
>That's just an excuse. That's like saying you need an SUV becuase you tow a
>boat once a year when really you use it to commute to your desk-jockey job
>everyday. Unlike the g-dub, Dean has some level of control over his own
>campaign I'm sure. The moment his security folks said for him to get into
>the Suburban he should have said "whoah, I'm supposed to be somewhat
>courting the progressive, in-tune crowd here. They know all about our
>dependence on foreign oil and how it's one of the root causes of war and
>terrorism. I can't show up in that thing. Get me a Daewoo waggon or
>something."
>
>
>>The point is...does he own it? Or was it what was rented for that
>particular
>>trip or by his security folks?
>>
>>-d
>>
>>----- Original Message -----
>>From: "cantrl. a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 12:24 PM
>>Subject: Re:Kevin Schmidt in GQ
>>
>>
>>> There is no excuse for owning a suburban unless you're towing something
>>really large or you're heading out on the ranch with four other cowboys to
>>lay some barbed wire fencing or to rustle some sheep that are stuck in a
>>fence. Even in those cases you're better off with a real work truck.
>>>
>>> If you're looking to move people around then you get a station waggon or
>a
>>mini-van. No excuses for this wankedness, not when you're trying to lead
by
>>example.
>>>
>>> Adam.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> >I was put off a bit by the Suburban too. However, knowing a little
about
>>> >executive security my bet is that he didn't choose the vehicle. The
boss
>>of
>>> >the broad shouldered men with him probably assigned it to him.
>>> >
>>> >It's also worth taking into account that there are valid purposes for
>>every
>>> >vehicle. He probably couldn't get everyone into a Toyota Prius. And the
>>> >Suburban probably still sucks less gas than the Kerry motorcoach.
>>> >
>>> >If Kevin was really interested in investigative journalism, he'd find
>out
>>> >what Dean has for a personal car.
>>> >
>>> >-Kevin
>>> >
>>> >----- Original Message -----
>>> >From: "cantrl. a" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>> >Sent: Tuesday, January 13, 2004 11:23 AM
>>> >Subject: Re:Kevin Schmidt in GQ
>>> >
>>> >
>>> >> Schmidt totally ruined Dean for me with those pictures of him pulling
>>up
>>> >in a Chevy Suburban. How is somebody supposed to take a person's word
>>> >seriously about an energy-dependence problem when they pull up in one
of
>>the
>>> >signature slub-mobiles?
>>> >>
>>> >> I hand it to Kevin for the investigative journalism. He's also kind
of
>>> >right in a way. If I am to accept that we live in a republic democracy
>>then
>>> >I also must face the fact that Dubya best represents the majority of
our
>>> >public, as sad as that might be. You can't just continue to happily
>drive
>>> >Suburbans around at the same time as you bad-mouth the invasion of
>>oil-rich
>>> >countries required to fuel them. It's ignorant, short-sighted
hypocrisy.
>>> >>
>>> >> Kerry's executive lounge liner made me almost pee my pants. What a
>>> >complete tool, that guy. The Harley thing on the Tonight Show did him
in
>>in
>>> >the worst possible way for me. If my vote even counted I'd vote dubya
>>over
>>> >both that wanker and the Lieberman republican wanker, whose biggest
>>concern
>>> >is taking away our video games. I'm with Schmidt, let's see an Al
>>Sharpton
>>> >ticket so we can give Ralph Nader some legitimacy.
>>> >>
>>> >> rtsp://video.c-span.org/project/c04/c04_wj010504_nader.rm
>>> >>
>>> >> Adam.
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >>
>>> >> > So I'm home sick and reading the web in my PJs. I see some news
>>> >> > stories about the primaries and I wonder again what happened to
>Kevin
>>> >> > Schmidt. Well checking out http://www.ninedwarfs.com
<http://www.ninedwarfs.com>
><http://www.ninedwarfs.com> it appears that
>>> >> > he's keeping himself busy preaching to the converted. I noticed
this
>>> >> > while there:
>>> >> >
>>> >> > "If you're interested, pick up the January issue of GQ and turn to
>>> >> > page 40 to see yours truly!"
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Congrats Kev!
>>> >> >
>>> >> -Kevin
>>> >>
>>>
> _____
>
>
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
