At 10:41 AM 1/15/2004, you wrote:
>Which were again all internal incidents yet again.
>
>Your not making any headway here man.  We were talking about Brazil
>fingerprinting Americans in response to our finger printing those that enter
>our country and require a visa, not everyone that enters, just those that
>require a visa.
>
>I was stating that I thought it was foolish politics because Americans do
>not travel abroad privately to commit acts of terror, and that is what the
>finger printing is supposed to help track.  I don't know if it will help or
>not, but that's what it's suppose to help with.

How many attacks in the last 5 years have there been in Cuba by Cuban
Americans? Haven't the Russians detained a couple of Americans in Chechnya?
Did not the British detain some Irish Americans at the height of the IRA
attacks?

What about the Americans captured in Central America by the Sandinista
government? They were engaged in terrorist acts against a legitimate
government.

Want more examples?

>
>You keep fighting this Americans are capable of the same thing fight.  I
>don't think anyone here disagrees that we are CAPABLE.  I am saying that we
>don't.  Again this is an idea that is in place to supposedly assist in
>mitigating risk.  This is something I know a little bit about.  If I were
>doing a risk assessment fingerprinting Americans coming into my country
>would be a simple waste of time and money. The risk of an American Citizen
>coming into Brazil in order to conduct an attack is so low that it wouldn't
>even register on my scale.  Smuggling, tax evasion, and illegal immigration
>would be of a much higher concern to me at these point of entry.
>
>--
>Timothy Heald
>Web Portfolio Manager
>Overseas Security Advisory Council
>U.S. Department of State
>571.345.2319
>
>The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
>Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
>opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
>unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 10:17 AM
>To: CF-Community
>Subject: RE: US Pilot arrested after obscene gesture at Brazilian immigrat
>ion.
>
>
>They were Sikh, but they were supported and planned the bombing in
>Vancouver.
>
>The fact that they were from India is irrelevant. I could have mentioned
>the FLQ, various anti-abortion groups, or sundry neo-nazi and other right
>wing groups.
>
>larry
>
>At 09:44 AM 1/15/2004, you wrote:
> >What nationalities and backgrounds were these "Canadians"?
> >
> >
> >--
> >Timothy Heald
> >Web Portfolio Manager
> >Overseas Security Advisory Council
> >U.S. Department of State
> >571.345.2319
> >
> >The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
> >Department of State or any affiliated organization(s).  Nor have these
> >opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
> >unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 9:41 AM
> >To: CF-Community
> >Subject: RE: US Pilot arrested after obscene gesture at Brazilian immigrat
> >ion.
> >
> >
> >Seriously, in Vancouver right now there is a trial of a group of Canadians
> >who set off a bomb on an Air India flight, killing over 200 people.
> >Terrorism and atrocity goes beyond nationality.
> >
> >larry
> >
> >At 09:18 AM 1/15/2004, you wrote:
> > >That's a very good point, Larry.
> > >
> > >-----Original Message-----
> > >From: Larry C. Lyons [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >The data shows that no one is immune, regardless of nationality.
> > >
> > >larry
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> >   _____
> >
> >
> >
>   _____
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to