A deer.

Bushy wrote:

>Doh.
>
>--Original Message Text---
>From: Matthew Small
>Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:39:23 -0500
>
>Well, make a dumb comment, get a dumb answer.
>
>- Matt Small
>  ----- Original Message -----
>  From: Bushy
>  To: CF-Community
>  Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:26 AM
>  Subject: Re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>
>  Yawn....
>
>  --Original Message Text---
>  From: Matthew Small
>  Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 11:31:18 -0500
>
>  Hmmm... so you're saying he can't use the word "soft"  I thought Microsoft had a trademark on "Microsoft", not "soft".  
>
>  - Matt Small
>
>  ----- Original Message -----
>    From: Bushy
>    To: CF-Community
>    Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 11:11 AM
>    Subject: Re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>
>    Not at all as long as its www.mikerowe.com
>
>    --Original Message Text---
>    From: Matthew Small
>    Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:51:21 -0500
>
>    You have a problem with a person looking to make a buck from his own name?
>
>    - Matt Small
>      ----- Original Message -----
>      From: Bushy
>      To: CF-Community
>      Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:33 AM
>      Subject: Re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>
>      Well I do!
>
>      --Original Message Text---
>      From: Matthew Small
>      Date: Thu, 22 Jan 2004 10:36:39 -0500
>
>      You're right, he knew it might get someone's attention and he wanted to make a buck from it.  I don't have a problem with that.
>
>      -Matt Small
>        ----- Original Message -----
>        From: Schuster, Steven
>        To: CF-Community
>        Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 10:25 AM
>        Subject: RE: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>
>        The kid probably knew it would get attention. Are people so stupid to think
>        stuff like this doesn't go unnoticed?
>
>        -----Original Message-----
>        From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>        Sent: Thursday, January 22, 2004 9:57 AM
>        To: CF-Community
>        Subject: Re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>
>        What's surprising to me is how virulently angry you are with this kid.  
>        It's not like he went around a neighborhood breaking car windows or
>        kicking dogs or something.  He's merrily tweaking a gigantic, clumsy
>        corporation to see what happens.  Why not?  Is Microsoft now an
>        untouchable, universally loved entity that no patriotic American should
>        dare make fun of?  Would you suggest we prostrate ourselves before our
>        right-honorable corporate masters now, or should we wait until it's part
>        of the EULA?
>
>        Personally, I like the fact that he was able to not only elicit a
>        response from the Beast From Redmond, but also caused them to seriously
>        embarass themselves in the process, as they're currently trying to
>        extricate themselves from the whole brouhaha right now:
>
>        http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5143614.html?tag=nefd_pop
>        <http://news.com.com/2100-1014_3-5143614.html?tag=nefd_pop>
>
>        MS can throw their corporate weight behind fighting piracy and crackers
>        and virus writers all they want.  They'd also have a much stronger case
>        if "MikeRoweSoft" were actually, say, putting out an operating system or
>        an Office suite or an incredibly shitty web server, but even they
>        realize now it was a mistake to even bother with this.
>
>        - Jim
>
>        Bushy wrote:
>
>        >No. Just a little puke.
>        >
>        >--Original Message Text---
>        >From: Tim Heald
>        >Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2004 17:47:45 -0500
>        >
>        >satire?  hello?  Fair use?
>        >  -----Original Message-----
>        >  From: Bushy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>        >  Sent: Wednesday, January 21, 2004 11:00 AM
>        >  To: CF-Community
>        >  Subject: re: www.mikerowesoft.com domain
>        >
>        >  Hi all,
>        >
>        >  Whats your thoughts on this frigg'in puke in British Columbia CANADA
>        >trying to monopolize on www.mikerowesoft.com.?
>        >
>        >  To be fair to MS it is copyright infringement.
>        >
>        >  http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/20/rowe.fight/index.html
>        <http://edition.cnn.com/2004/TECH/internet/01/20/rowe.fight/index.html>  
>        >
>
>          _____
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to