If it's that minimal than yeah I can see your point.
Still think it could be pretty bad. We've had what three patches dealing
with RPC? Still haven't fixed all the problems in there yet.
--
Timothy Heald
Web Portfolio Manager
Overseas Security Advisory Council
U.S. Department of State
571.345.2319
The opinions expressed here do not necessarily reflect those of the U.S.
Department of State or any affiliated organization(s). Nor have these
opinions been approved or sanctioned by these organizations. This e-mail is
unclassified based on the definitions in E.O. 12958.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jochem van Dieten [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Saturday, February 14, 2004 3:42 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: Re:FW: Windows Source Code Loose on the 'Net\
Heald, Tim wrote:
>
> Since the source code leaked, and there is no review, bug or patch
> process in place, and since we have all seen how slow M$ can be to respond
> to vulnerabilities, often times needing 2 or 3 patches before they
> actually fix a problem, I can see why people think this is a major
> problem.
Not really. Maybe if *all* the source code leaked. But this is only about
3%.
Jochem
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
