>I think it can be the case that the opposite is true. But, I'm no doctor.
>-d
>
>----- Original Message -----
>From: "dana tierney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Sent: Monday, February 16, 2004 11:38 PM
>Subject: Re:Cholesterol
>
>
>> hmm. Is the inverse true? Total can be low yet bad chloresterol too
>high?Last time I had mine checked my doctor laughed and said my chloresterol
>was better than his. (And he was about 20 years younger.) I think he said 76
>total, no separate testing done for good and bad.
>>
>> Just curious. I am still trying to understand the relationship of
>chloresterol and the gall bladder; having minor gall bladder problems but
>decided against surgery at this time.
>>
>> Dana
>>
>> >215 can be a source of concern or not, depending on your HDL and LDL
>levels.
>whats
>>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
