The story by Phillip K. Dick was written before computers were common.

Like most movies the story was better, but the movie was still well done.

Tim
  -----Original Message-----
  From: Haggerty, Mike [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:44 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: RE: Minority Report

  I had the same feeling about the ball initially, but got past it. I
  think the wooden ball was just a legacy of a time when a computer's
  primary output device was a punch card instead of a monitor.

  * spoiler alert, in case anyone cares *

  The premise of the story was pretty intense, that an event in the future
  can be predicted and prevented without temporal consequence. The way it
  played out as a morality tale, however, didn't appeal to me as much.

  I didn't understand why the head of precog would be so paranoid about
  that one video after so many years. It seemed to me he could have
  remained quiet about it a little while longer and gained a lot more.

  Tom Cruise's character was pretty cool. It was hard to fathom how that
  chain of events was going to take him where he ended up, and that it was
  linked to the actions of the director in the way it was.

  M

  -----Original Message-----
  From: brobborb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  Sent: Tuesday, February 17, 2004 4:27 PM
  To: CF-Community
  Subject: Re: Minority Report

  This is what i find kinda silly.  Why do they have to have the name
  carved into a ball/marble? Why not just have it displayed on a screen,
  without getting fancy schmancy.  If anything, it will save time.  I hate
  it when they add in this "cool" factor and it just turns out to be
  silly...for me anyways

  What else did you think about the film?
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to