We're upgrading right now, and my CFHTTP calls worked after I rewrote them
slightly.

Basically, for some reason I had this:

<CFHTTP WHATEVER...>
processing logic including outputting the #file.filecontent#
</CFHTTP>

The obvious problem is where the end cfhttp call is. Doing this solved any
problems:

<CFHTTP WHATEVER...> </CFHTTP>
processing logic including outputting the #file.filecontent#

The bonus is that cfhttp works much better with MX at getting things like
linked files in the html head area like stylesheets and .js files.

-Kevin

----- Original Message -----
From: "Chunshen (Don) Li" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "CF-Community" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2004 10:46 AM
Subject: Risk of Upgrading to CF6.1 from 6.0

> Hi,
>
> I have not had a good experience of upgrading from CF5.x to CF6.0 at the
request/urge of two MM R&D staff (actually via HOF) back about six months
ago.  My platform is Windows XP.  The key reason for me to consider the move
is the current version's "bug, not?" in CFHTTP tag's https call.  The tag is
robustness and reliability is critical to some applications that I'm
seriously considering.
>
> What's your thought on this?  Thanks.
>
> Don Li
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to