> >Baltimore area that have been overturned as a result of DNA testing. In
> >one case, an innocent man lost 32 years of his life because the state
> >proved, to the satisfaction of a jury, he was the killer.
>
> >M
>
> Do you have a better idea man?
I think it's a constantly evolving process. As I said before, our current
legal system is predicated on sophistry. It's just about who presents a
better argument of the possible events. With advances in forensic science,
we're seeing that the venerable methods of motive, witness, deduction, etc
are faulty.
As forensic science improves, I think there will be an ongoing evolution of
the legal process.
-Kevin
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
