but this response is over the top, especially since it's pretty
obviously either a) the result of a misunderstanding or b) absolutely right.
I'm assuming that you're using the CF internal server on a dev box. If
this is correct, then he misunderstood, since he said that people would
be foolish to use it for production.
If I'm wrong, and you are using it for production, then he's right.
Since MM explicitly states that the internal server is really only
intended for testing and not for production, it would be foolish to
ignore that warning and try to use it in a production environment.
Either way, I think you're getting a little too upset here.
--benD
Chunshen (Don) Li wrote:
> You're just NUTS. Previously, you offered WRONG opinion on my CF6.0
> upgrade.
> Now you tried to insult me.
>
> DO ME A FAVOR. NEVER NEVER NEVER EVER EVER
> COMMUNICATE WITH ME AGAIN IN ANY FORM FROM THIS POINT ON. If my memory
> sucks I'll punish myself by drawing blood from my arm!!!!!!!!!!11
>
> >Word to your mother, Ray.
> >
> >Anyone foolish enough to use CF's internal server for hosting a
> >production Web application deserves to have their directories browsed.
> >
> >M
> >
> >-----Original Message-----
> >From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >Sent: Wednesday, March 03, 2004 10:38 AM
> >To: CF-Community
> >Subject: RE: Macromedia is HORRIBLE
> >
> >
> >The only time it isn't controlled by IIS (or Apache) is when you use the
> >internal web server, which is NOT recommended for production. This,
> >imho, is
> >a non-issue.
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
