Network latency, speed of post traffic, complaints about the HoF system not
processing fast enough, etc. Points on first come will open a larger can of
worms.
I'm working on the DBs today in order to start the thread labeling process. I'm
also playing with the interface some to give a universal site search (google)
and more options where people can see them. I appreciate the feedback people
have given and will give. The final decision as to how a thread will be marked
is still up in the air.

> I think it would be pretty cool if you could submit a question and whoever
> answers it correctly first gets a point.  Not al that applicable to this
> list but the more technical lists would find it interesting.  Similar to
> experts exchange but if you could manage the whole thing thru email it would
> be prety cool.  Would be interesting to come up with ways to prevent fraud
> and such.
>
> DRE
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Campbell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2004 10:07 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: Re: Important threads
>
>
> Actually, since some people's description of a problem might be a little
> different (although, how many ways you can say "Hey, did anyone hear
> about Microsoft buying Macromedia?") - that "Recently Answered" would be
> most useful if it had a link to the discussion as well.
>
> - Jim
>
> Ben Doom wrote:
>
> >"Trollbait" and "Learn to Google"
> >
> >:-)
> >
> >Seriously, a "recently answered, check archives" kind of thing would
> >probably be good as well.
> >
> >--BenD
> >
> >Michael Dinowitz wrote:
> >
> >
> >>Now that I've got some (forced) free time, I'm going to do a few things:
> >>1. finish up all the things on the subscription UI
> >>2. Move all the lists into a central DB
> >>3. clean up all the urls for a more unified and shorter look
> >>4. Set up a way for people to set a thread as being important
> >>
> >>That last part is the one I wanted to talk about. Which sounds better,
> >>voting for a thread or having some higher level 'managers' set a thread as
> >>answered or important? What are the categories that you would like to see.
> I
> >>assume answered and important are the top 2, but what about OT (and does
> it
> >>apply here). Are there others that I should think about?
> >>Thanks
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
>   _____
>
>
>
>
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to