and authority to prevent it...
does that make you in some way responsible?
'criminally responsible' in this article was clearly emotional rather
than a factual statement. By international law the US/UN was not
criminially responsible, although I'm sure that not acting went against
the UN Charter.
So answer the question.
Why did the US/UN not help?
And does this not imply a degree of hypocrisy.
-Gel
-----Original Message-----
From: Raymond Camden [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 06, 2004 5:56 PM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: Rwandan Genocides
While we should have helped, at the end of the day, only those who
commit
the murder are responsible for it.
-rc
---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.614 / Virus Database: 393 - Release Date: 3/5/2004
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
