here..
-----Original Message-----
From: John Stanley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 10:08 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
it's all confusing, very confusing.
not nice and flowery at all.
perhaps this will put is all in perspective : http://jen-garner.net/
<http://jen-garner.net/>
-----Original Message-----
From: Lyons, Larry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:51 AM
To: CF-Community
Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
Very different. The Americans were uniformed military personnel, none
of
the Guantanamo Bay detainees were in uniform. Although a good case can
be
made for many of them being soldiers for the Taliban government.
larry
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Adkins, Randy [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:27 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: RE: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> You know, after thinking about it, how is this different than
> the POW that were held in Vietnam?
>
> Isn't American doing the same thing that the Vietnamese did?
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Angel Stewart [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 20, 2004 9:22 AM
> To: CF-Community
> Subject: 600 at Guanatanamo bay:US not accountable to any court.
>
>
> "After U.S. forces attacked al-Qaeda and its Taliban
> protectors in October 2001, thousands of prisoners were swept
> up amid the fighting across Afghanistan (news
> <http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/manual/*http:/search.news.ya
hoo.com/se
arch/news?p=%22Afghanistan%22&c=&n=20&yn=c&c=news&cs=nw> - web
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/manual/*http:/search.yahoo.com/bin/sea
rch?cs=nw&p=Afghanistan> sites). More than two years later, nearly 600
captives remain jailed in a military prison built at Guantanamo Bay
Naval
Base in Cuba. Today, the U.S. Supreme Court (news
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/manual/*http:/search.news.yahoo.com/se
arch/news?p=%22U.S.%20Supreme%20Court%22&c=&n=20&yn=c&c=news&cs=nw> -
web
<http://us.rd.yahoo.com/DailyNews/manual/*http:/dir.yahoo.com/Government
/U_S__Government/Judicial_Branch/Supreme_Court/> sites) hears arguments
over whether the Bush administration must justify its claimed right to
hold
these captives indefinitely. However the justices rule, the cases put
core
U.S. values on trial. While the war on terrorism may be unique,
asserting
the right to hold prisoners forever without court oversight ought to
trouble
any American."But does it really trouble Americans? Does anyone actually
believe that these 600 people are all terrorists?
-Gel
--
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG Anti-Virus (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 7.0.230 / Virus Database: 262.9.1 - Release Date: 4/20/2004
_____
_____
_____
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]
