Its actually not fair to assume that Larry, because I have heard through the grapevine that some are attending
  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Lyons, Larry
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 11:01 AM
  Subject: RE: FOLLOW UP Re: RSVPing.

  Beth,

  It seems to me that you've done everything reasonable. If they insist on not
  replying, its fair to assume that they are not attending.

  larry

  > -----Original Message-----
  > From: BethF [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
  > Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 3:04 PM
  > To: CF-Community
  > Subject: Re: FOLLOW UP Re: RSVPing.
  >
  >
  > Oh Phil,
  > I would LOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOVE to.
  > We made it SO easy to RSVP - I hired a service that gives me
  > a toll free phone number and a web page that people can RSVP
  > to.  In addition, the service CALLED every single person who
  > didn't RSVP and we still have that many people who haven't
  > bothered RSVPing.
  >   ----- Original Message -----
  >   From: Philip Arnold
  >   To: CF-Community
  >   Sent: Monday, May 10, 2004 10:51 AM
  >   Subject: RE: FOLLOW UP Re: RSVPing.
  >
  >
  >   > From: BethF
  >   >
  >   > So, how rude of me is it to call people who haven't RSVP'ed
  >   > for the wedding?
  >   > I wouldn't normally but its 66 people.  
  >
  >   Here's a slightly more "evil" idea
  >
  >   Send out letters to the 66 people saying:
  >   "Since you have not responded to the RSVP, I understand
  > that you will
  >   not be attending the wedding and reception.
  >
  >   If you do decide to attend, there will be no food or drink
  > prepared for
  >   you, so please bring your own packed lunch or picnic."
  >
  >   <g>
  >
  >
  >
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to