There are no programmers who don't use the manual.  None, they don't exist.  If someone claims this, I would not hire that person.  This is akin to saying that somebody writes bugless code the first time, every time.  Bad form, especially bad interviewer.  You might even think twice about working for a company that asks such a question.

In the USMC, it was required to have the manual open next to me while working on equipment.  They did not want us to memorize procedures - it can be unsafe if somebody forgets an essential step.

- Matt Small

  ----- Original Message -----
  From: Jim Davis
  To: CF-Community
  Sent: Tuesday, May 04, 2004 10:45 PM
  Subject: Do you use the manual?

  I had a rather impromptu interview today.  One of the questions got me
  thinking.

  I was being asked about the speed of my coding and was waffling a bit (since
  I honestly don't know how to answer that... doesn't it depend on the problem
  at hand?)  He then refined the question and asked "do you need the reference
  when you code?"

  I answered "Sure."  He asked "Why?" and I answered "Why would I want to
  memorize everything in there?"  He didn't seem happy with the answer.

  It got me thinking.  I've always felt that it's more important to know where
  information is (and be able to get to it quickly) than to "know" it.  I
  consider myself a good, fast coder, but I code with a good reference manual
  at my fingertips (or livedocs.macromedia.com in a dedicated window).

  I've never considered this a negative... any opinions?  Do you use the
  manual often?  Would you hire somebody that did?

  It's just something that I've never considered as particularly positive or
  negative until today.

  Jim Davis
[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

Reply via email to