Re: one for heald

[dana tierney]

yeah it does :) fwiw I agree with you -- if this parcel of land is causing fatal accidents I think the government should yes, strongly encourage that it be planted. Doesn't seem like a lot to ask, considering. It just reminded me of your stance on the smoking issue and I wondered if you would disagree.

Dana

>dispose of private property??  I am not sure what you mean.  If the land
>owner is causing accidents than he should be held liable.  Also the
>interstate system was originally a department of defense project.  I think
>that it is still important to the national security of the United States.
>That being the case I think that the government must take some
>responsibility as to the solution to this problem.
>
>Does that answer the question?
>
>Tim
>  -----Original Message-----
>  From: dana tierney [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>  Sent: Sunday, May 02, 2004 8:16 PM
>  To: CF-Community
>  Subject: one for heald
>
>
>  just curious whether he would still say the right to dispose of private
>property is absolute in cases such as:
>
>  http://www.gallupindependent.com/043004pitch.html

---

[Todays Threads] [This Message] [Subscription] [Fast Unsubscribe] [User Settings]

---