As for the error messages not reflecting the changes - this is a known bug.
--- Rob Rusher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Jim, > I got this response from Sean Corfield: > > >Linux is case-sensitive for some things in CFMX (calls within CFCs). > >Make sure the code uses the same case as the filename (and, given that > >you've mucked about with the case of the filename, you'd be safer to > >remove any .class files CFMX created and maybe restart CFMX - and > >re-register the CFX tag?). > > HTH > > Rob Rusher > > --- Jim Finucane <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Heres an interesting problem. I have a CFX tag that is wrapped in a cfc > > function under redhat 7.2. When I invoke the cfc from a cfm page the CFX > tag > > executes as expected, but when I invoke the cfc from a flash movie (via > > the remoting interface) it throws the following error. > > > > The CFX custom tag 'CFX_SSocket' was not found in the custom tag > > database. Please be sure to add custom tags to the database before using > > them. If you have added your tag to the database then you should check > > the spelling of the tag within your template to insure that it matches > > the database entry. > > > > Error processing CFX custom tag 'CFX_SSocket'. > > > > I tried renaming and re-registering the tag and it works from the cfm > > page but fails with the same error via flash, the only odd thing I > > noticed is the error message > > does not reflect changes I made to the case of the tag. The first time I > > complied the class I named it SSocket and registered it as CFX_SSocket, > > I tried re-registering > > the tag as cfx_ssocket and keeping the class name the same. I ran > > through all the combinations of this naming scheme including recompiling > > the class with all lowercase > > chars, all upper, mixed ...etc and it failed every time, however it > > worked every time from the cfm page even when the case of the class file > > did not match the case > > in the cf admin. I also restarted the server between these cycles yet > > nothing worked. Is it possible that this is some kind of security > > feature of the flash remoting > > interface or is this some kind of bug? > > > > Anyone come across this type of thing before? > > > > Thanks, > > > > Jim Finucane > > > > > ______________________________________________________________________ Get the mailserver that powers this list at http://www.coolfusion.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Archives: http://www.mail-archive.com/cf-linux%40houseoffusion.com/ To Unsubscribe visit http://www.houseoffusion.com/index.cfm?sidebar=lists&body=lists/cf_linux or send a message to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with 'unsubscribe' in the body.
