it
would depend on the datatype and the database, but I think their point was that
a null value takes up the same amount of space as if it had a value, so it would
take the amount of space required to hold a value, but for readability and
usability, and possibly because I'm just plain lazy, I would just allow nulls in
the first table unless it was a very large datatype.
|
- [KCFusion] actual space Adaryl Wakefield
- Re: [KCFusion] actual space (off topic btw) Dunwiddie, Bruce
- Re: [KCFusion] actual space (off topic btw) Adaryl Wakefield
- Re: [KCFusion] actual space (off topic btw) Chris Stallo