I'm
seeing it on one of our test servers as .5 ms avg to run an include, and 1 ms to
run a custom tag. Can anyone else verify that the custom tag would take about
twice the time?
-----Original Message-----
From: Dunwiddie, Bruce [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 06, 2003 10:29 AM
To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]'
Subject: [KCFusion] include vs custom tagWe're still using cf 4.5 sp2. We're currently having a disagreement about whether to define our new framework for a site based on custom tags for each page basically, or the same thing using includes instead. I personally think the custom tags are a complete necessity, because of variable scoping, but I need to know the true benchmarking difference that people have seen when using one vs the other, or just in a per call difference in milliseconds per call, if anyone happens to know it or can point me to somewhere with the stats.
