Dear Jonathan, > > Those new standard names look fine to me. > > In the end, do you think we need any change to the convention for this > purpose? > I think we do not; all that's required is that the definition of these new > standard names should note that a coordinate variable or scalar coordinate > variable with the required standard name must be included to specify the > threshold(s). >
I agree. It's like area_fraction. Best regards Heinke _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
