Dear Phil > Do you think it would it be useful to > add a short footnote to this effect to section 3.3, or is the use of the > phrase "physically equivalent (not necessarily identical)" in that > section self-evident?
I don't know, really - I wonder what others think? Best wishes Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
