Dear Luca and Jonathan,
I agree with Jonathan not to use "atmospheric_layer in standard_names.
Christiane
Jonathan Gregory a écrit :
Dear Luca, Christiane
aerosol_asymmetry_parameter_of_atmosphere_layer
aerosol_asymmetry_parameter
The same as for extinction cross section, the first one is 3D
(lon,lat,lev), the second 2D (lon,lat)
For consistency with other names, these would be
aerosol_asymmetry_parameter_of_atmosphere_layer
atmosphere_aerosol_asymmetry_parameter
although (as I've said before) I think maybe we should (for all such names)
just have the second variant, and distinguish between them by the presence or
absence of a vertical coordinate variable.
Cheers
Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
--
======================================================================
Christiane Textor
Laboratoire des Sciences du Climat et de l'Environnement
Unite Mixte de Recherche CEA-CNRS-UVSQ
LSCE/IPSL laboratoire CEA/CNRS/UVSQ
Saclay, Orme des Merisiers,
Bat. 701, Piece 3b, Point Courrier 129
F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette Cedex
FRANCE
mailto: [email protected]
Tel ++33 1 69 08 34 07 Fax ++33 1 69 08 77 16
GEOmon scientific coordinator http://www.geomon.eu
======================================================================
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
