Hello,

Rosalyn has very quickly cleared up one problem I was having: I couldn't
get the cf-checker to accept my string of 800 flag_meanings. The problem
lies in the interpretation of Section 3.5 of the CF Conformance
Requirements and Recommendations:

>>      
>> "The type of the flag_meanings attribute is a string whose value is a

>> blank separated list of words or phrases (words connected by 
>> underscores)."

The cf-checker currently interprets "words" as alpha-numeric characters
only. This excludes hyphens and abbreviations (as in "Alaska-St. Elias
Range tundra", "Trans-Baikal Bald Mountain tundra"), and also "/" and
",", which occurred in my list. My feeling is that the restriction in
the cf-checker should be relaxed and the text clarified -- but it would
be interesting to know what machine-readability criterea people have in
mind for this flag_meanings attribute.

Regards,
Martin 
 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: V. Balaji [mailto:[email protected]]
> Sent: 27 October 2009 19:01
> To: Lawrence, Bryan (STFC,RAL,SSTD)
> Cc: [email protected]; Weatherall, Pauline; Juckes, Martin
> (STFC,RAL,SSTD); Ed Hartnett
> Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Dealing with large numbers of flag
> valuesinnetcdf cf
> 
> Bryan Lawrence writes:
> 
> > My job is to persist data indefinitely, and I'm relying on
vocabulary
> > servers ... (and in particular, Roy's ... ) somehow we will persist
> > the vocab.ndg.nerc.ac.uk address, regardless of nerc's future, and
of
> > ndg's future, although if ac.uk went away we might be in trouble
:-).
> 
> Could happen...
> 
> http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2009/oct/18/conservatives-defence
> 
> I see nerc.co.uk coming...
> --
> 
> V. Balaji                               Office:  +1-609-452-6516
> Head, Modeling Systems Group, GFDL      Home:    +1-212-253-6662
> Princeton University                    Email: [email protected]
-- 
Scanned by iCritical.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to