Hello I have reviewed the CF documentation and found nothing that suggests that logarithmic scaling of variables is CF-convention compliant. The only reference I have found is in the 2005 archives where a user commented that their data was stored in bytes and they needed to scale it using the transformation:
real_data = 10 ^ (scale_factor * raw_data + add_offset) whereas it appeared that the only conformant transformation was: real_data = (scale_factor * raw_data + add_offset). Has there been any changes over the intervening 5 years that enables users to stored log scaled datasets in a CF-convention conforming manner? So far my reading has led me to the conclusion that the only possibility is to describe the variable in the long name to be the logarithm of the measured data. Is that the accepted solution? Kind Regards Steve -- Dr Stephen Emsley :: ARGANS Limited :: www.argans.co.uk T: +44 1752 764295 | M: +44 7912 515418 | [email protected] This message is to be treated as private and confidential, and the information in it may not be used or disclosed except for the purpose for which it has been sent. ARGANS is a limited company registered in England & Wales. Registered number: 6313966. Registered address: Thatchers, Russells Water, Henley on Thames, Oxon, RG9 6EU
_______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
