On 10/18/10 1:32 AM, Bryan Lawrence wrote:
That's the narrow technical perspective. The "social" question is
whether there is a significant benefit to the community from defining
is a single approach that is general enough to handle the necessary
range of model-generated tracer particle clouds. How commonly does
one want to share trajectory files between models?
How common is it to want to share software for handling trajectory
output? In my experience, common enough to justify getting this right.
Agreed. Sharing this kind of information is getting more common, and I
think it will be even more common if we can get a data standard established.
I've been out of town, but hopefully I can work out some examples with
our tools next week.
I've cc'ed Al
Hermann here, who comes to mind as another modeler who might be
interested in discussing this question.
Maybe we could get some of us Seattle folk together in the same room. I
could use some hand-holding. Was Al interested?
-Chris
--
Christopher Barker, Ph.D.
Oceanographer
Emergency Response Division
NOAA/NOS/OR&R (206) 526-6959 voice
7600 Sand Point Way NE (206) 526-6329 fax
Seattle, WA 98115 (206) 526-6317 main reception
[email protected]
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
