Dear Jonathan and all,
*> I think it is wrong to add a "bounds" attribute to a formula term
attached to a vertical coordinate. Only the coordinate itself
should have a bounds attribute.
The CF standard doesn't clarify that. It doesn't say whether formula terms
can have bounds, or whether bounds can have formula terms, or both. If both,
then they have to be consistent somehow. We should clarify this, I think.
You think bounds should have formula terms (if applicable) but not vice-versa,
is that right?
Correct. It makes sense to me for a coordinate to have bounds, which
indicate the extent of the cell. I'm not sure what bounds on parameters
in a formula mean (i.e. the formula terms). On the other hand, once you
have defined the coordinate bounds, it would be nice to be able to go
from the dimensionless values to an actual location in space via the
formula, which clearly requires formula terms for the bounds.
Best,
Karl
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
