Hi Paul,

From the CF Checker point of view, it does a comparison to ensure that the units specified in the netcdf file are dimensionally equivalent to those specified for the standard_name (if specified) in the Standard Name table. For the standard_name "depth" the canonical units defined are metres. Hence the error message you received. Hopefully, someone will be able to advise if there is a more appropriate standard_name available, which better matches your needs.

Regards,
Rosalyn.

On 06/07/11 01:34, [email protected] wrote:
Hi there Folks..

Just wondering about the use of the vertical coordinate depth, and in particular 
"pressure" with the units "decibar"..

Seems to me that the conformance checker (v2.0.2) available at 
http://puma.nerc.ac.uk/cgi-bin/cf-checker.pl doesn't much like "pressure" complaining 
that the units "decibar" is not consistent with those in the standard_name (v1.5/v17 
table:

<file>
        double depth(depth) ;
                depth:units = "decibar" ;
                depth:units_long = "decibar (pressure)" ;
                depth:long_name = "depth" ;
                depth:standard_name = "depth" ;
                depth:axis = "Z" ;
                depth:positive = "down" ;
                depth:bounds = "depth_bnds" ;

<checker output>
Checking against CF version 1.5...
...
Using CF Checker Version 2.0.2
Using Standard Name Table Version 17 (2011-03-24T11:54:30Z)
Using Area Type Table Version 1 (5 December 2008)
...
------------------
Checking variable: depth
------------------
ERROR (3.1): Units are not consistent with those given in the standard_name 
table.



I'd appreciate some feedback if I have things around the wrong way here..

Cheers,

P

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

--
Rosalyn Hatcher
NCAS Computational Modelling Services
Dept. of Meteorology, University of Reading,
Earley Gate, Reading. RG6 6BB
Email: [email protected]     Tel: +44 (0) 118 378 6016

_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to