Dear Karl I agree with Karl about this:
> I'm not sure why we should assume anything if the bounds are > missing. Making an assumption would be valuable if the absence of > bounds invariably implied a rule (e.g., centers half-way between > bounds), but otherwise the assumption could be wrong, so what have > we gained? ... > It might especially be difficult to decide where to place the bounds > in the case of unevenly spaced grid-points. While I agree we should not assume a default for missing bounds, I think it would be good to recommend that bounds should be included. At present we do not do this. If we made it a recommendation (in section 5.1), the CF_checker would give a warning if there were no bounds. Cheers Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
