Thanks Steve; understood. Ian.
--------Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Steve Emmerson Sent: 30 September 2011 15:54 To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] Is the "bits" unit CF-compliant? -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ian, On 09/30/2011 01:00 AM, Culverwell, Ian wrote: > Does > > <singular>bit</singular> > > mean that "bits" (plural) is not a valid unit? The unit "bits" is automatically created and added from the unit "bit" if the entry doesn't have a <plural> tag, which is used for things like "foot" and "feet". - --Steve -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAk6F2BMACgkQqos4yNz3KBHhWgCdEu5ude9sTxNFl3AKArtfaj3K MV8AnjAGfs8PnILG/D75EuAYFVj479pI =PjYj -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
