Dear all,

   At the risk of repeating ourselves, because there are now (at least) three 
different salinities, it is now ambiguous and confusing to call any salinity 
"Salinity".  The Announcement of TEOS-10 that is now appearing in all 22 
oceanographic journals specifically recommends that the use of the word 
"Salinity" cease immediately, and that either the words "Practical Salinity" or 
"Absolute Salinity" be used.  The reason of course is to minimise ambiguity. 

   So this is where the community (including CF-metadata) will have to end up:- 
we have been requested to do so by IOC, SCOR and IAPSO.  So we may as well do 
it now, in my view.

   Note that all ocean models run to date have used Practical Salinity as their 
"Salinity" variable,, and all equations of state since 1980 have been in terms 
of Practical Salinity.  So there is no slight-of-hand in calling these 
variables "Practical Salinity"; rather it is just being specific as to what 
this type of salinity always has been.  That is "Practical Salinity" is simply 
the long-hand name of what we have been calling "Salinity" for 30 years.  

   Trevor


-----Original Message-----
From: Lowry, Roy K. [mailto:[email protected]] 
Sent: Wednesday, 5 October 2011 1:43 AM
To: Jonathan Gregory; Durack, Paul (CMAR, Hobart)
Cc: McDougall, Trevor (CMAR, Hobart); [email protected]; 
[email protected]; King, Brian A.; Barker, Paul (CMAR, Hobart); 
[email protected]; [email protected]
Subject: RE: [CF-metadata] new TEOS-10 standard names

Dear All,

My feelings on this were (and still are) comfort with the addition of 
'practical_salinity' names, but significant discomfort with the replacement of 
'salinity' by 'practical_salinity' through deprecation of 'salinity'.

Cheers, Roy.

-----Original Message-----
From: [email protected] 
[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Jonathan Gregory
Sent: 04 October 2011 14:13
To: [email protected]
Cc: [email protected]; [email protected]; [email protected]; King, 
Brian A.; [email protected]; [email protected]; 
[email protected]
Subject: Re: [CF-metadata] new TEOS-10 standard names

Dear Paul

Alison (the manager of standard names) hasn't "ruled" yet on their inclusion,
but I believe that the discussion concluded with no objections to adding
the practical salinity names. It seems safe to assume they will be put in the
table in due course.

Best wishes

Jonathan
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
-- 
This message (and any attachments) is for the recipient only. NERC
is subject to the Freedom of Information Act 2000 and the contents
of this email and any reply you make may be disclosed by NERC unless
it is exempt from release under the Act. Any material supplied to
NERC may be stored in an electronic records management system.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to