Dear All,

Today I have added some links to the CF website Standard Names, Documents and 
Discussions pages. All three pages contain the same new links to the CEDA 
vocabulary manager status pages for standard names. The "status of current 
work" page shows the status of standard names proposals that are in progress at 
this moment. The "completed work" page is an archive of resolved standard names 
proposals (i.e., names that are either now published in the table or proposals 
that were rejected for some reason). If you would like to see what the pages 
look like you can also follow these links directly:

Current Status: 
http://ndg.nerc.ac.uk/vocab-term-editor/viewCurrentStatus/http%253A%252F%252Fvocab.ndg.nerc.ac.uk%252Flist%252FP071%252F18

Completed Work: 
http://ndg.nerc.ac.uk/vocab-term-editor/viewCompleteStatus/http%253A%252F%252Fvocab.ndg.nerc.ac.uk%252Flist%252FP071%252F18

Please note that the current status page will change frequently. I am in the 
process of updating it to show all the standard names that are in the various 
stages of discussion on the mailing list (at the time of writing not all 
proposals are shown, so please don't think yours has been forgotten if it 
doesn't appear immediately). I think it is important to point out that the 
status pages are in no way intended to replace the CF mailing list, but rather 
to complement it. Proposals for new standard names should still be made to the 
mailing list and discussed there as usual. I hope that over time the status 
pages will become the first port of call for anyone wishing to check on the 
progress of a standard name proposal. The following is a more detailed 
description of how to interpret the pages.

When a new proposal is made I will create an entry for it in the CEDA 
vocabulary manager so that it appears on the current status page. I will update 
all entries periodically as the discussions proceed. Thus the status page is 
intended as a quick way of checking the progress of each standard name proposal 
without the need to trawl through lengthy mailing list threads. The entry for 
each name contains a link to the most recent relevant posting on the mailing 
list and this is intended to make it easy to look back at the detailed 
discussion if needed. The titles of all relevant mailing list threads are 
shown, which can be useful if a discussion has diversified into multiple 
threads or someone has changed the subject field (incidentally, I'd rather 
people didn't change the names of threads unless it is strictly necessary as it 
just makes it more difficult to keep track of things).

The entry for each name lists the current status of the proposal and the 
background colour of the entry also reflects the status. Proposals can be: new 
(blue background) - just proposed to the list, no comments yet received; under 
discussion (a rather appropriate muddy brown background); accepted (bright 
amber background) - the discussion of this name is concluded and it will be 
added to the standard name table at the next update; submitted (green) -  an 
update to the standard name table is underway and the name is in the process of 
being published.

Once a name has been successfully published in the standard name table on the 
CF website and in the NERC vocabulary server its entry is moved from the 
current status page to the completed work page. The completed work page has 
just two colour codes: completed (grey background) - the name is now published 
in the standard name table; rejected (red) - the proposal was rejected after 
discussion on the mailing list, for example, because a duplicate name already 
exists or because the proposer withdrew the name from consideration.

This probably all sounds a lot more complicated than it really is! I hope that 
the pages will prove to be a useful reference and that they will be easier to 
use than they are to describe. Hopefully the completed work page will grow into 
a useful archive of past decisions on standard names (and reasons why we took 
those decisions) which will complement the much more detailed record in the 
mailing list archives.

Best wishes,
Alison

------
Alison Pamment                          Tel: +44 1235 778065
NCAS/British Atmospheric Data Centre    Email: [email protected]
STFC Rutherford Appleton Laboratory     
R25, 2.22
Harwell Oxford, Didcot, OX11 0QX, U.K.


-- 
Scanned by iCritical.
_______________________________________________
CF-metadata mailing list
[email protected]
http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata

Reply via email to