I will be glad to open a trac ticket. Let me have a day or so draft some amendment wording. My intention is to use Unidata's recommendations in the NetCDF Users Guide as a starting point, and include notes about conformance and avoiding conflicts.
--Dave On Tue, Jan 3, 2012 at 11:49 AM, Jonathan Gregory <[email protected]> wrote: > Dear all - such as Roy, John (Graybeal) and Mark (Hedley) > > Would someone have time to open a trac ticket to propose a change to the CF > convention, in order to clarify the Conventions attribute, following all this > useful email discussion? It seems to me that it would be good to make a > definite decision. I think it's been recognised that, whatever the syntax, it > is up to the data-writer to ensure that multiple conventions do not conflict, > so we ought to state this as well as defining the permissible syntax. > > Best wishes > > Jonathan _______________________________________________ CF-metadata mailing list [email protected] http://mailman.cgd.ucar.edu/mailman/listinfo/cf-metadata
